Science, Art or Magic?

There is a great attempt to explain the similarities

and differences between art and science in this 2016

article which appeared in Forbes.

But couldn't we just accept as fact 

that certain things are best explained by

 MAGIC?

Last fall I played with eco-dying and enjoyed making prints on paper from the leaves I collected on my hikes.  I turned these sheets into covers for notecards and happily sold every one that I made.  But there was a fair amount of "slippage," those attempts that failed, misprinted, didn't make color or for some reasons became a page that fell short of artistic use.

So this year I decided to dive deep into scientific research conducting various experiments and recording my findings.  So out of my nature! But let's eliminate the misprints, ok?

I set up 3 different mordants (the liquid soak that prepares the fibers to accept the color) labeling them and giving each test paper the same amount of soak time.

I divided my leaves by types and included a few I'd never tried. (Not all botanticals will leave a visible print with this steaming method.) Oak was always a challenge but I decided to include it in my attempts.

Three different mordants, 2 kinds of cotton paper, several leaf types (pressed previously), a steaming pot outside and I was in business, er, science lab mode.  

Wow!  Look at that oak, that geranium, that batista and those maples...on a roll: sumac, sassafras and beech.  Dump the vinegar soak, eliminate the ammonia...I was ready to rock the next day with 100% success.  Papers prepped I went to bed exhausted but smiling for the success to come.

I was rewarded, above.

I was disappointed, above.

I was confounded, above.

None of these are ghost prints, the print bleeding through the paper or the mark left by the "top" of the leaf (best prints come from "ground side down" on the paper). And not an oak to be seen.  Whaaaa?

So I made adjustments in pressure (the vise or stones or blocks that hold the bundles tightly together). I varied the timing of the "cool." I stood on one foot and I sang out loud.  Everything STILL came out in about the same ratio of great : good : blah.  

My conclusion? MAGIC.

I did not record where I found each leaf, the soil conditions it grew in, the altitude it lived in...in my heart I know that these are all contributing factors to whatever hides deep within the tannins et al that leave the mark I covet.  I'm not that into research.  And frankly I like the fact that there is a part of this that I cannot control, it makes opening the steamed bundles quite exciting.  Some phenonmena can be explained and some things are best left to magic.  

I rest my case.

MAGICALLY IN AWE,

Cindy

Trade Secrets

"What are the secrets of your trade?

What would you lose by sharing them with others?

What would you gain?

(work page from The Steal Like an Artist Journal,

by Austin Kleon)

I love doing the exercises in Kleon's wonderful journal which he refers to as "a notebook for creative kleptomaniacs."  But the question above really spoke to me due to an experience I had yesterday in a booth at a local country fair.  I was so taken aback that I even discussed it with my husband.

I noted a tent display featuring printed leaves that appeared to be similar to what I have done to produce notecards (in fact this is prime gathering time of flora for future steamings) so I went in to have a closer look.  She had lovely things, mostly single leaf prints on paper, matted, framed and identified as to tree species.  Cousins to what I do but not exactly the same.  I was very admiring as I noticed that she had a lovely black color on a few that I never seem to get.  

in process, some leaves still on paper 

So I posed a question:

"Do you treat these leaves with..."

She interrupted me explaining that the leaves are all natural and that what I see is the print she gets.

"Yes," I said.  "I do this same process but I never get that cool black.  Do you dip the leaf..."

....and before I could say "iron bath" she abruptly turned and walked away leaving me chatting to myself.

Why?  I saw no other customer.  I don't think anything I said was an insult.  All I could assume was that she was not into sharing 'trade secrets.'  

leaf prints before drying

What a shame.  I'd have been delighted to share with her how to get the fabulous sumac print seen above (she only showed maples) and I would have had fun telling her about a few failures I experienced as well (thus saving her a similar waste of precious time).  Was she afraid of competition?  Silly, I think, as in a quick glance around the fair and I saw many, many potters and a ton of painters all seemingly offering slightly different work.  Did she believe she had more to lose by chatting with me than to gain?

A pity.

In galloping through so many different art fields I have found that those who share (i.e. those with the self confidence to answer questions and trade techniques) are truly the most accomplished.  Is this because their own attitude promotes the exchange of ideas that enables growth for both parties?  Perhaps so.  Or is it that their kindness in sharing makes people want to do business with them.  Of course.

Art is not rocket-science, it is not a proprietary algorhythm which unlocks the secrets to the universe.  Art always bears the signature of its maker even when the same techniques are used.  Anyone who accomplishes anything creative stands on the shoulders of those who came before them.  It is my experience that those who fail to share will have karma to answer to.

But how do you feel about this topic? I may be all wrong...do you share your trade secrets: formulas, recipes, techniques or methods? why or why not?

I'll get off my soapbox!

HAPPY TO SHARE,

Cindy

p.s. Where did I spend my money?  Funny, but it was with the women who were showing some cool hats and were tickled when I asked a question about the process.  They were happily explainging how they made them as they proceded to cash in...ch-ching!